Backward design
Every unit starts from a CEFR can-do statement, meaning what learners should be able to achieve. Each activity and assessment is then aligned to that goal.
Your job is the bigger picture: every class, teacher, level, and program. Jinso brings student work together, so issues surface early and you can decide how to respond.
Each activity follows frameworks language educators already use, so every task has a clear purpose.
Every unit starts from a CEFR can-do statement, meaning what learners should be able to achieve. Each activity and assessment is then aligned to that goal.
Each module introduces the language with clear models, moves learners from controlled to increasingly authentic practice, and ends with a task they complete on their own.
Support moves from guided exercises and images toward role-play and independent production. Any activity can shift to a neighboring CEFR level while keeping the same objective.
Jinso checks understanding throughout every activity, not only at the end. When your team needs a formal measure, it adds diagnostic and proficiency tests.
The tutor works from your approved materials, the lesson objective, and each learner's past performance. It adapts to every student without leaving your syllabus, level, or sequence.
Each cycle produces evidence that shapes the next one. The AI proposes; your team reviews and approves.
Grades from separate classrooms don't tell the whole story. Jinso gathers work from lessons, practice, assignments, assessments, conversations, and speaking tasks, so your team can look at:
A teacher sees one struggling student. You need to see when the same struggle shows up in six classes. Jinso helps you find:
Swap end-of-term impressions for real student work: answers, attempts, scores, rubric results, and feedback. Coaching conversations get more specific, and support is easier to coordinate.
Jinso puts activity and performance data into shared reports, so your team no longer loses hours:
A report earns its keep when it tells you what to do. With Jinso, your team can decide to:
At one partner institution, students kept writing questions like "Where you're from?" Jinso surfaced the pattern: 28% of 916 attempts at asking questions were incorrect, and 14 of 145 learners had made the error three or more times across different lessons.
The academic team reviewed it, pinpointed the grammar behind it, and linked targeted practice to classroom instruction. Six days later, one of those learners wrote "Where's the bus station?" without help. Next, the team checks whether the error rate drops across the same classrooms.
Instead of "How are our classes doing?", your team can ask which goals students are meeting, where the same problems keep showing up, and what to fix next.